Re: Intestacy statute interpretation

From: Kalogredis, Stephanie <skalogredis_at_harvpenn.com>
Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 14:59:50 -0400

I stand corrected. Thanks for the detailed analysis.
Stephanie

        -----Original Message-----
        From: Alison Smith [mailto:ats_at_fgsmlaw.com]
        Sent: Thu 8/31/2006 2:22 PM
        To: realproperty_at_list.pabar.org
        Cc:
        Subject: [realproperty] Re: Intestacy statute interpretation
        
        

        I was going to post, but Maureen beat me to it. I represented the other
        party referred to in her post. I agree with Eric's analysis and with
        Kirby that children of deceased first cousins do not inherit when there
        are first cousins living.
        
        Alison T. Smith
        Feldstein Grinberg Stein & McKee, P.C.
        428 Boulevard of the Allies
        Pittsburgh, PA 15219
        (412) 263-6119
        (412) 263-6128 (fax)
        
        *CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE*
        The information contained in and documents accompanying this electronic
        mail transmission contain confidential information belonging to the
        sender which is legally privileged. The information is intended only for
        the use of the individual or entity to whom this electronic mail
        transmission is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, you
        are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying , distribution or the
        taking of any action in reliance on the contents of this electronically
        transmitted information is strictly prohibited. If you have received
        this message in error, please immediately delete this message and any or
        all attachments.
        
        -----Original Message-----
        From: realproperty-bounce_at_list.pabar.org
        [mailto:realproperty-bounce_at_list.pabar.org] On Behalf Of Maureen Gluntz
        Sent: Thursday, August 31, 2006 1:26 PM
        To: realproperty_at_list.pabar.org
        Subject: [realproperty] Intestacy statute interpretation
        
        I had a similar case here in Allegheny County which addressed this exact
        issue. I am attaching the Argument section of the brief I filed. After
        the
        filing of this brief, the opposing parties withdrew their Petition, so I
        am
        assuming that my analysis was correct. In addition, another party filed
        a
        brief arguing the same points.
        
        Hope it's of some help to you.
        Maureen
        
        Maureen P. Gluntz, Attorney at Law
        7500 Brooktree Drive, Suite 302
        Wexford, PA 15090
        
        724-933-7272
        724-933-7202 (fax)
        gluntzlaw_at_earthlink.net
        www.gluntzlaw.com
        
        
        This email is for the use of the intended recipient(s) only. If you
        have
        received this email in error, please notify the sender immediately and
        then
        delete it. If you are not the intended recipient, you must not keep,
        use,
        disclose, copy or distribute this email without the author's prior
        permission. We have taken precautions to minimize the risk of
        transmitting
        software viruses, but we advise you to carry out your own virus checks
        on
        any attachment to this message. We cannot accept liability for any loss
        or
        damage caused by software viruses. The information contained in this
        communication may be confidential and may be subject to the
        attorney-client
        privilege. If you are the intended recipient and you do not wish to
        receive
        similar electronic messages from us in future then please respond to the
        sender to this effect.
        
        
        
        
Received on Thu Aug 31 2006 - 11:59:49 PDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Thu Aug 31 2006 - 12:01:04 PDT